I got my Note 5 yesterday (Global Version) and it will replace my Redmi 5 Plus. However, I anticipated that the performance and speed would (e.g. opening apps) be much better on Note 5, however, I only feel a small difference.
Im currently using global 8.5.11 Beta. Are the china roms any faster?
Even in comparision with a Mi Mix 2s - the performance is slighly noticeable.
MIUI's system performing well on every Xiaomi devices and there are mostly no differencies depending on your hardware.
I was wondering whether to get the Pro or Plus version but I feel the difference is small, it is a bit faster maybe but not so noticeable and what about the camera? How much better is the camera in Pro vs Plus? Also big thing is Plus has soooo much more rom support than Pro. They came out around same time,I don't know how long it will take for Pro to reach same amount of roms and I don't feel like the wait is so worth it.
n3w0rk said:
Even in comparision with a Mi Mix 2s - the performance is slighly noticeable.
MIUI's system performing well on every Xiaomi devices and there are mostly no differencies depending on your hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used both Mi Mix 1, Mi Mix 2 och Mi 5s Plus. All of these phones felt noticeably faster in comparison. Perhaps because of the faster memory or more optimized software.
Antutu Scores
I have both the Redmi 5 Plus (Global Stable 9.5.11.0 NEGMIFA) 625 SOC and the Redmi Note 5 AI China (Global Stable 9.5.11.0 OEIMIFA)636 SOC
The Antutu Scores are as follows:
Redmi 5 Plus (Global Stable 9.5.11.0 NEGMIFA) 77072 (CPU 38783, GPU 12693, UX 20377 and MEM 5219)
Redmi Note 5 AI (Global Stable 9.5.11.0 OEIMIFA 115507 (CPU 56020, GPU 20883, UX 32192 and MEM 6412)
I valso have a NOKIA 7 Plus which scores as follows, just to give a comparision.
141134 (CPU 64832, GPU 29994, UX 39242 and MEM 7066)660 SOC
Looking for the best phone for 300
Mi9
Much better camera hardware here.
It depends what's important to you.
Mi Note 10 is better at:
- Screen, Mi Note 10 has an AMOLED Screen with slightly better ppi (K30 comes with an IPS LCD)
- Way better cameras
- Battery
K30 5G is better at:
- Processor
- Slightly faster RAM
So if you want great photos and video with a great screen and a great battery = Mi Note 10
Gaming and overall performance speed, 5G data speed = K30
which phone of Samsung is performing better fold 2 or fold 3?
Of course overall better performance are fold 3 with snap 888 but snap 865+ is still fast.
Snap 888 little faster reaches throttling than 865+.
Hi, I hope you doing well I can see your post it’s really interesting I wish you can see my site and give me some idea about my <a href=”https://oxfoot.co/”>Oxfoot for fashion<a/> thank you!
I'm looking for a new phone to replace my "old" OnePlus 8 Pro who's display isn't happy anymore and I also need something with good stock UI cause for my new job I need a locked bootloader so no Evolution X or whatever anymore.
I like One UI the most having had a Note 3, 5 and 9 in the past.
So, if between the S21+ and S20 Ultra, at the same price, which one would you recommend?
Look inside here:
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus: What is the difference?
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the smartphone ranking.
versus.com
I was more hoping for some real world experience based recommendations. I know the theoretical and spec differences but I wanna know what people think real-world.
Such evaluations are always subjective, do not have to correspond to device's specs, to serious benchmark tests. Personally I never would rely on such evaluations.
I came across with two tests today comparing the both processors. Though some people would be interested. I would also like to see the both phones users confirming the results on their side. 3DMark Wild Life scores on the other hand are a bit disappointing for Exynos. I have currently ordered an Exynos version and still have time to cancel it. What would you recommend?
Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) vs S22 Ultra: which is better? | NR
We compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) with S22 Ultra to find out which phone has a better camera, screen, performance, and battery life.
nanoreview.net
Page not found - ASOLANDIACASH
1 said:
I came across with two tests today comparing the both processors. Though some people would be interested. I would also like to see the both phones users confirming the results on their side. 3DMark Wild Life scores on the other hand are a bit disappointing for Exynos. I have currently ordered an Exynos version and still have time to cancel it. What would you recommend?
Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) vs S22 Ultra: which is better? | NR
We compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) with S22 Ultra to find out which phone has a better camera, screen, performance, and battery life.
nanoreview.net
Page not found - ASOLANDIACASH
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would definitely keep your order running.
I had both versions of the S21 ultra.
Im not playing games, but use my phones a lot... And to be honest, i couldn't feel or see any difference.
I pre-order the S22 ultra to in the Exynos version without any concerns vs the SD version.
I have the Tab S7 to and never had any problems.
This is just my humble opinion
Per Tom's Hardware:
Ice Universe says that the AMD RNDA2 GPU part of the Exynos SoC has a target clock speed of 1.9 GHz. However, in practice, due to thermal issues, it could only run at 1.29 GHz, in an acceptable manner. Various clocks between 1.29 GHz and 1.9 GHz were tested, goes the tale, but the lesser speed was the first with acceptable thermals. The actual temperatures are not revealed, instead we learn that all for speeds greater than 1.29 GHz, they are "hot".
Ice Universe has some further interesting info about what Samsung is trying now that it has hit that thermal throttling performance wall. According to Ice Universe's leak, Samsung is going to try and tweak things to get the GPU running acceptably at 1.49GHz "to restore some dignity".
I've used both of them and based on my experience, Snapdragon is always better. It gives you stable performance and often supports bootloader unlocking.
sureshkumargs said:
I've used both of them and based on my experience, Snapdragon is always better. It gives you stable performance and often supports bootloader unlocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Snapdragon often supports bootloader unlocking" Not on S Series devices, much wider availability on Exynos variants. Only one Snapdragon variant offered bootloader access on the S21 Ultra, SM-G9980.
You would find More developers working on snap dragon than Exynos to bring custom ROMS. If you see devices such as Poco F1, OnePlus 8T and X3 Pro you would find almost every custom from working on them.
This is a S22 Ultra Forum, we're not discussing a bunch of cheap Chinese phones nor is the OP asking questions about them. What does your response have do with the unlocked bootloaders on S Series variants? Exynos devices have far more development and custom ROM's on S Series than Snapdragon. In reality development is declining with Samsung devices, Android 12 and OneUI 4 has made it far more challenging to implement custom platforms.
1 said:
I came across with two tests today comparing the both processors. Though some people would be interested. I would also like to see the both phones users confirming the results on their side. 3DMark Wild Life scores on the other hand are a bit disappointing for Exynos. I have currently ordered an Exynos version and still have time to cancel it. What would you recommend?
Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) vs S22 Ultra: which is better? | NR
We compare Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon) with S22 Ultra to find out which phone has a better camera, screen, performance, and battery life.
nanoreview.net
Page not found - ASOLANDIACASH
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you've ordered a Exynos equipped device I assume you're in Europe or the UK, correct? So your Service Provider can only enable all their Call Features (5G, Carrier Aggregation and the rest) if you have a Exynos Chipset and their branded phone or possibly the unlocked device. How valuable are those features to you? For me it's a no brainer, I would only aquire the Snapdragon SoC no matter where I lived "if" I wanted the device, which I don't. The more that is made public, the less confidence I have in the S22 Ultra, particularly the Exynos version. Honestly, if someone gave one to me for free, I'd give it back.
Thanks for the replies. I've found this on youtube and it shows that the performance of Exynos 2100 has been improved / optimised in time and caught up with SD so decided to keep Exynos version.
1 said:
Thanks for the replies. I've found this on youtube and it shows that the performance of Exynos 2100 has been improved / optimised in time and caught up with SD so decided to keep Exynos version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the S21 Exynos SoC. The S32 Ultra has a Exynos 2200 Chipset which has been totally redesigned.
varcor said:
That's the S21 Exynos SoC. The S32 Ultra has a Exynos 2200 Chipset which has been totally redesigned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm aware of it. I shared it as a reference of how Samsung support Exynos 2100 in time and improved it's performance. So Exynos 2200 might have a lower score against SD at the moment but it's performance will be improved in time too.