[TESTING] cGroups parameters - CPU Optimizer update - L Speed

Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
Code:
echo "800000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_period_us
echo "62" > /dev/cpuctl/*/cpu.shares
echo "700000" > /dev/cpuctl/*/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/*/cpu.rt_period_us
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
Download an APK from the attachment.
Governor tuner is broken on this build, so don't report it.
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.

testing right now, i'll be back with report next morning.

Paget96 said:
Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any command to check it, I wanna compare it with my device's default, if u don't mind 9f course?

Dims_Camper said:
testing right now, i'll be back with report next morning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, waiting.
zputnyq said:
Any command to check it, I wanna compare it with my device's default, if u don't mind 9f course?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, it'll give less time for root cGroup and a bit more for background one. I also provided some docs in first post, so you can read what they affect.

Paget96 said:
Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
Code:
echo "800000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/cpu.rt_period_us
echo "62" > /dev/cpuctl/bg_non_interactive/cpu.shares
echo "700000" > /dev/cpuctl/bg_non_interactive/cpu.rt_runtime_us
echo "1000000" > /dev/cpuctl/bg_non_interactive/cpu.rt_period_us
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did read the docs, but can you dumb this down as to what this will do?
Thanks

martyfender said:
I did read the docs, but can you dumb this down as to what this will do?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, why not.
If you check
Code:
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
you can see PIDs (process IDs) of all the task which device started.
Parameters from above controls how much time can one of the tasks from the list access to the CPU resources. In our case it's 0.8s out of every 1s, and for backround its 0.7s out of every 1s.
Got it?
We can also increase it too for future testing.

Paget96 said:
Thread dedicated for testing various cGroup parameters.
Try this out.
Open terminal, run root shell and copy paste next code.
You can also suggest other parameter range.
Related docs:
https://access.redhat.com/documenta...esource_Management_Guide/sect-rt_options.html
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Resource_Management_Guide/sec-cpu.html
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks for support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dan, my device has different path for "bg_non_interactive"
When I tried the command u gave, my terminal said tmp-mksh blablabla(I forgot).
My path for it, is here
"dev/cpuctl/apps/bg_non_interactive"
Should I add the path?

Paget96 said:
Sure, why not.
If you check
Code:
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
you can see PIDs (process IDs) of all the task which device started.
Parameters from above controls how much time can one of the tasks from the list access to the CPU resources. In our case it's 0.8s out of every 1s, and for backround its 0.7s out of every 1s.
Got it?
We can also increase it too for future testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not quite. Is this to reduce the overall cpu load, where certain tasks could hog the cpu? In effect, improving performance and battery life? Will you be releasing alphas to test? Do you want our device defaults are?
Thanks

so this is my battery stats since i was running the script, the screen-on-time sux (yea i know, maybe this is due kernel that i flashed lol) standby time is just like before which is great. i noticed no lag, and maybe this phone is processing task little faster so it cost my screen-on-time?

martyfender said:
Not quite. Is this to reduce the overall cpu load, where certain tasks could hog the cpu? In effect, improving performance and battery life? Will you be releasing alphas to test? Do you want our device defaults are?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll release a test version when new GovTuner implementation will be done, so it's probably today
Dims_Camper said:
so this is my battery stats since i was running the script, the screen-on-time sux (yea i know, maybe this is due kernel that i flashed lol) standby time is just like before which is great. i noticed no lag, and maybe this phone is processing task little faster so it cost my screen-on-time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SO you have experienced a little bit faster task processing?
If you feel so that SOT is not impacted then it's ok
zputnyq said:
Dan, my device has different path for "bg_non_interactive"
When I tried the command u gave, my terminal said tmp-mksh blablabla(I forgot).
My path for it, is here
"dev/cpuctl/apps/bg_non_interactive"
Should I add the path?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for letting me know
We'll get some improvements.

One thing, I almost forget, @Paget96
As a report, my device run smoother & faster when I tried that command. For battery drain I couldn't test it, because it seems my battery worn out lately.
For this command
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
It couldn't be run on my device due to permission problem

Paget96 said:
I'll release a test version when new GovTuner implementation will be done, so it's probably today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So will this feature included in GovTuner option? Because at the moment I'm using governor profiles (specific for my device) and I'd like to continue using them because they're really well tuned. Could I suggest you to divide GovTuner feature and this feature?
Sent from my bullhead using XDA Labs

zputnyq said:
One thing, I almost forget, @Paget96
As a report, my device run smoother & faster when I tried that command. For battery drain I couldn't test it, because it seems my battery worn out lately.
For this command
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
It couldn't be run on my device due to permission problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome
Now waiting for battery life reporting
edoardotavecchio said:
So will this feature included in GovTuner option? Because at the moment I'm using governor profiles (specific for my device) and I'd like to continue using them because they're really well tuned. Could I suggest you to divide GovTuner feature and this feature?
Yes it's separated. This is CPU Optimizer update
Sent from my bullhead using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

...
The battery life hasn't changed to me, and i have nothing to complain about, but the UX has increased a lot, and thats why its amazing.
Enviado de meu Redmi Note 3 usando Tapatalk

zputnyq said:
One thing, I almost forget, @Paget96
As a report, my device run smoother & faster when I tried that command. For battery drain I couldn't test it, because it seems my battery worn out lately.
For this command
/dev/cpuctl/tasks
It couldn't be run on my device due to permission problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1

ADM.GL said:
...
The battery life hasn't changed to me, and i have nothing to complain about, but the UX has increased a lot, and thats why its amazing.
Enviado de meu Redmi Note 3 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good ^^
kchaisu said:
+1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You also have battery problem?

Apk uploaded.
Check first post

ADM.GL said:
...
The battery life hasn't changed to me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After updated, now I see.
Infinity SOT?
Cool.
It is draining only half than usual. UX remains insane. It was a super double level up.
A very good UX and* an excellent Battery life.
On the way to perfection.
Enviado de meu Redmi Note 3 usando Tapatalk

Added support for all possible cGroups, first post updated with new APK.
If you want, you can also donate me using this link:
http://paypal.me/Paget96
or simply disable adblocker and support me with ads inside the app
Thanks guys

I've got write deferral instead of cgroup when I download apk. Any possible reason?
Sent from my Samsung GT-I9300 using XDA Labs

Related

[Request] Device Tune-up Beta

Can someone post the apk?
I second that. It wont let me download it
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
mgorman said:
I second that. It wont let me download it
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
itll be back up tomorrow if you can wait.
http://forums.t-mobile.com/t5/Device-Tune-up-Beta/Beta-Availability/td-p/395039
What does this app do?
Chopes said:
What does this app do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AndroidCommunity.com said:
T-Mobile has just released Device Tune-up for open beta testing. This is a new feature in the My Accounts app from T-Mobile. It’s essentially a task killer that aims to improve on your phones performance and it should help your battery last longer by killing apps that run in the background.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds interesting enough.
Here is the whole post:
Read the bold text
Welcome to the Device Tune-up Beta - Info and FAQ's [ Edited ]
Options
06-11-2010 03:29 PM - last edited on 06-15-2010 02:34 PM
Background:
T-Mobile is continually looking for ways to bring new innovation to our customers. Within the My Account application, we are adding new functionality in the My Device section called Device Tune-up. Device Tune-up is built to run in the background at all times and ‘tune-up’ the device by closing unused services that are running.
Device Tune-up is different from most task killers because it does not require you to do anything. Device Tune-up will default to 'on'. While on, Device Tune-up proactively closes services to help the device and battery perform at their best. Most pre-loaded applications will not be affected by Device Tune-up. For our non-technical users, this may mean you never even realize Device Tune-up is running; your device may simply run better.
Getting Help & Providing Feedback:
Do not contact Customer Care for help or feedback regarding the Device Tune-up Beta.
We are looking for as much feedback as we can get! If you need any help at all, please post any questions, issues or suggestions you have in our Device Tune-up Beta board. We will do our best to help you as quickly as we can.
Requirements:
This beta will work on all T-Mobile Android devices running 2.1 and below. If installed on a device using 2.2, the you may see the My Device BETA icon but you will not have the Device Tune-up functionality.
This beta has not been tested on any devices running custom software outside of T-Mobile approved versions. It is recommended you do not install this beta if you are running a custom ROM.
Ready to get started?
NOTE: This beta has incomplete Spanish translations. If installed on a device using Spanish you will only get some translations.
Thanks for your participation in the BETA!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tibere86 said:
Can someone post the apk?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=6839155&postcount=5
Thank you !!!!!!!

(Finally solved) How to prevent app from closing???

Yes guys...! Finally problem is solved guys. I got one paid app on market 'ram manager' which has special features to control ur ram. Especially it has option for multitasking with non killing apps. Means u can now multitask & still ur apps will run in background until you choose it to close. I have tested it since 1 hour. I have opened gallary, ucbrowser, opera mobile & go launcher (above mentioned every app is so much ram hungry app). And I am amazed that even after 1 hour all apps are still opened. Its really so amazing guys Really its a worth app.
Here is link of that app.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1305060
I am really fed up of this problem. I surf alot xda using opera. Opera mobile nearly take 30-40 mb ram. So for me I get nearly 130-140 mb free ram. But even though when I try to open some other apps then automatically android closes opera. So I have to reopen it. No problem in re-opening an app but then it start to load links which I have been surfing which really annoying me ::
I want simple multi tasking like nokia which keep open every app until u choose it to close it. I am really impressed with multi tasking of nokia.
Can anybody provide a solution, app or script or anything which will KEEP APP IN OPEN STATE until I choose it to close it ?? I searched on net. I found same complaints on net related to android muti tasking...!!! I dont use any task killer app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same problem with me too........I too surf xda using opera mobile and this happens wide me 2
Use dolphin hd browser. Faster and better.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
kemistry01 said:
Use dolphin hd browser. Faster and better.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry problem is not browser. Problem is how android handles multi tasking. I just want that android should not close app without our permission like in nokia. But in android it close app without let u know.
vishal24387 said:
sorry problem is not browser. Problem is how android handles multi tasking. I just want that android should not close app without our permission like in nokia. But in android it close app without let u know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try this. I don't know if it's only the paid version that allows exempting, but it's worth a shot. once you go into the processes, you can click the browser specifically and click to change it from "excluded (no)" to "excluded (yes)". this should make it exempt from android's method of memory recovery (not a task killer app)
Are you using this? Try disabling it and see what happens.
You can do it from terminal emulator:
Code:
su
chmod -x /system/etc/init.d/S95allinone
and if you want to re-enable it:
Code:
su
chmod +x /system/etc/init.d/S95allinone
(reboot your phone of course)
I had the same ques initially
Check this thread started by me
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1094076
loSconosciuto said:
Are you using this? Try disabling it and see what happens.
You can do it from terminal emulator:
Code:
su
chmod -x /system/etc/init.d/S95allinone
and if you want to re-enable it:
Code:
su
chmod +x /system/etc/init.d/S95allinone
(reboot your phone of course)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no i am not using any script.
ggclanlord said:
I had the same ques initially
Check this thread started by me
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1094076
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i checked that thread. But there people have discussed only related to problem. Nobody mentioned any solution.
Finally solved problem. See OP.
vishal24387 said:
Yes guys...! Finally problem is solved guys. I got one paid app on market 'ram manager' which has special features to control ur ram. Especially it has option for multitasking with non killing apps. Means u can now multitask & still ur apps will run in background until you choose it to close. I have tested it since 1 hour. I have opened gallary, ucbrowser, opera mobile & go launcher (above mentioned every app is so much ram hungry app). And I am amazed that even after 1 hour all apps are still opened. Its really so amazing guys Really its a worth app.
Here is link of that app.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1305060
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man. Just what i was looking for.
Q
Sorry to bump an old thread, but has anyone actually found a solution to this problem? I've tried supercharger, minfree manager, RAM manager pro, and Galaxy Tuner. None have proven to be an actual solution to the problem that seems to be baked right in to the heart of all versions of Android after eclair.
Is this at all fixable?
bill
i tried this with balance profile.seems good till now.
btw vishal whuch profile are u using ??
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app
simratcs said:
i tried this with balance profile.seems good till now.
btw vishal whuch profile are u using ??
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also just found this thread, and must give a big thanks! Finally a program to enable proper multitasking! It actually works!
cix18 said:
same problem with me too........I too surf xda using opera mobile and this happens wide me 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So guys try using uc browser HD
:laugh:
xposed solution
kriraj said:
So guys try using uc browser HD
:laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry I forgot to follow up, a solution has been found after many hours of searching: using the "Xposed app settings" add-in for the Xposed Framework will let you whitelist applications from Android's "banhammer of destruction" and it works particularly well on devices with little free ram.
b
Thanks for the info, I just used it!
vishal24387 said:
Yes guys...! Finally problem is solved guys. I got one paid app on market 'ram manager' which has special features to control ur ram. Especially it has option for multitasking with non killing apps. Means u can now multitask & still ur apps will run in background until you choose it to close. I have tested it since 1 hour. I have opened gallary, ucbrowser, opera mobile & go launcher (above mentioned every app is so much ram hungry app). And I am amazed that even after 1 hour all apps are still opened. Its really so amazing guys Really its a worth app.
Here is link of that app.
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1305060
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have j7 pro which is known for ram management issues and this did not help. In fact I believe these apps get kiled by android as well!
Read the thread; solution already found
Greight said:
I have j7 pro which is known for ram management issues and this did not help. In fact I believe these apps get kiled by android as well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you had read the thread, you'd see that I already shared that Xposed App Settings is the only solution.

Android permissions management - LBE Privacy Guard alternative

I've found a new way to BLOCK ANY permission for android applications! Successfully tested denial on few different kind of permissions!
It's a great news for me, and prossibly to any of you too.
The application will be completely native except user interaction part (GUI), so lightning fast, and will have access virtually to any permission granted by apk itself. There will be much logic included to ease of use for unexperienced users, but also the advanced mode which will reveal all the system level functions/data. Advanced iptables control will probably be included also at the later development stages.
Any developer experienced with NDK + SDK is kindly asked to contact me.
PS. This thread WILL be the thread for the application itself. I expect to make first alpha's in two months or earlier.
Reserved for future use
Hey krzych, I am interested in this development, can we discuss more on this ?
ukanth said:
Hey krzych, I am interested in this development, can we discuss more on this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course. So let it stay at pm as you already started . We'll move here depending on the case .
I am interested but I am not a developer.
The question is - did you check apps behavior (reaction) on permission denial?
I get FC for some software with this tool market.android.com/details?id=com.stericson.permissions&hl=en
frsp2 said:
I am interested but I am not a developer.
The question is - did you check apps behavior (reaction) on permission denial?
I get FC for some software with this tool market.android.com/details?id=com.stericson.permissions&hl=en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot check this on every app available (for obvious reasons), but I suppose most of them will work. We'll see after first alpha, I'll check it on my own app set which is rather big (the main reason LBE and PDroid buth fails - too much CPU overhead).
UPDATE: Removing unreliable info. Shame on me for reposting smth before fact checking.
Privacy Blocker is the app with patching apk method, not the Stericson' one.
frsp2 said:
I've read somewhere on local forum that com.stericson.permissions application just changes manifest and reinstall apk with patched one.
This info is not mine so I can't prove or disclaim it at this time.
Can you confirm that info is correct and your method is totally different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, neither the app you describe, neither mine will not change anything in apk. I think it was just a rumour.
Could you please comment on this app too
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.xeudoxus.privacy.blocker&hl=en
http://www.droidforums.net/forum/xeudoxus/131027-support-privacy-blocker.html
It indicates baksmali usage btw.
I have used this app and for me it drains my battery...:/
"Ever wondered why??"
.xxx. said:
I have used this app and for me it drains my battery...:/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What app?
Privacy blocker should not run in background - it patches apk content.
Modified files:
classes.dex
MANIFEST.MF
MYKEY.RSA
MYKEY.SF
I see no reason to drain battery here.
frsp2 said:
What app?
Privacy blocker should not run in background - it patches apk content.
Modified files:
classes.dex
MANIFEST.MF
MYKEY.RSA
MYKEY.SF
I see no reason to drain battery here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about LBE.
"Ever wondered why??"
.xxx. said:
I'm talking about LBE.
"Ever wondered why??"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess they run live 24h web cam show from your phone to China, that's why.
frsp2 said:
I guess they run live 24h web cam show from your phone to China, that's why.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Yeah.
"Ever wondered why??"
Nice chat guys, but first of all, I just told that neither permissions denied nor mine app will change the apk, so asking me about commenting such app is quite inaprioriate, and second, there are two threads about LBE wher even I said my opinion about it, so please, go there and read .
krzych said:
I just told that neither permissions denied nor mine app will change the apk, so asking me about commenting such app is quite inaprioriate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am asking because of the same software niche not because of the same principle of operation. If your application solves the same task/problem with less overhead - that's good. We'll see.
BTW is your app must be run in background all the time?
If yes what will be the effect if your program terminates on error or is closed by external application?
frsp2 said:
BTW is your app must be run in background all the time?
If yes what will be the effect if your program terminates on error or is closed by external application?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only effect it would cause is no GUI, but denial still working. GUI can be simply restarted (or restarted automatically).
krzych said:
Only effect it would cause is no GUI, but denial still working. GUI can be simply restarted (or restarted automatically).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sehr gut! This is the right way to go.
Also is your future app support real-time notification of permission requests?
frsp2 said:
Sehr gut! This is the right way to go.
Also is your future app support real-time notification of permission requests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not. I know it's a good thing, but it has it's flaws too. We'll see later.
Alpha ready? Me want asap! I love pdroid, would love another way to secure myself even more

[APP][ROOT][CLOSED BETA][2.3+]Simple batterystats.bin wiper

Disclaimer: If this app breaks your device, it is your fault for attempting to use this app. If this app does anything that is not expected, keep in mind that it is in beta, and YOU were the one who wanted to try it.
This app simply wipes your battery stats; it is very simple, just a TextView and a button. If there are any improvements to this app, feedback is allowed; it is in beta, after all. If you would like to be part of the closed beta, please send me a PM. This app will eventually cost money, yet I just want to have a beta so that I can get feedback.
Screenshots are in the attachments (taken from rooted Nook Tablet 1.4.3)
Send a PM if you want to try, and feel free to add suggestions and how to fix them; I will send the code with the app
alevineman said:
This app simply wipes your battery stats
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhm... Trying not to be harsh here... but wiping than .bin file doesn't really do anything, AFAIK...
Well, maybe resetting then Battery Log Statistics (Settings - Battery), but other than that, I don't really get it why you have to do that...
souler456 said:
Uhm... Trying not to be harsh here... but wiping than .bin file doesn't really do anything, AFAIK...
Well, maybe resetting then Battery Log Statistics (Settings - Battery), but other than that, I don't really get it why you have to do that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mah life is a lie
I heard this:
The battery indicator in the status/notification bar is a reflection of the batterystats.bin file in the data/system/ directory.
alevineman said:
Disclaimer: If this app breaks your device, it is your fault for attempting to use this app. If this app does anything that is not expected, keep in mind that it is in beta, and YOU were the one who wanted to try it.
This app simply wipes your battery stats; it is very simple, just a TextView and a button. If there are any improvements to this app, feedback is allowed; it is in beta, after all. If you would like to be part of the closed beta, please send me a PM. This app will eventually cost money, yet I just want to have a beta so that I can get feedback.
Screenshots are in the attachments (taken from rooted Nook Tablet 1.4.3)
Send a PM if you want to try, and feel free to add suggestions and how to fix them; I will send the code with the app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...-battery-stats-does-not-improve-battery-life/
"It has no impact on the current battery level shown to you.
It has no impact on your battery life."
Does literally nothing of worth
Lol you're gonna charge for this?
Sent from my Nexus 7 running Kangakat powered by elementalX
alevineman said:
mah life is a lie
I heard this:
The battery indicator in the status/notification bar is a reflection of the batterystats.bin file in the data/system/ directory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read here to open your eyes for the whole truth
Come on, guys. The file is literally called batterystats.bin. What did you possibly think it was?
The battery bin file only stores stats about what's used you're battery

[APP] Ultra Booster - 10x Fast Charger - Apps Booster- App Manager - Cache Cleaner

​
Download now​
​
Ultra Booster highlights:
? Fast and effective: The advanced scanning system cleans all the junk files.
? Lightning fast: Boosts memory, cleans the cache, and saves battery life... all in just seconds!
? Battery Saver: Ultra Booster kills useless, battery-hogging background apps to speed up your phone and extend your battery life.
? Root Modes: With the Root option, it cleans the entire memory most effectively and accelerates the application and games %100
? Game & Apps Optimizer: Even regular phone use can slow down your games. UltraBooster accelerates the games on the phone and allows them to run faster.
? Smart: Working in background makes the phone most effective.
?Efficient: Uses minimal energy and battery, creating more power your favorite games and apps.
Ultra Booster Features:
Boost your application with one click!
Speed up your games effectively.
Quickly clean the cache files on the phone.
Speed up your RAM & CPU %70.
Fill the battery more safely with a quick charge.
Improve your battery %80.
Use the phone in an efficient manner using the modes.
You feel 100% speed difference on rooted phones.
Find information about your phone.
Smart notification warn you for dangerous issues.
Guys, please write a comment in topic. Please support us.
If you want promo codes, please write want under this topic.
When using the ram booster and cache eraser, can you explain how this works because the way android works is to fill ram and cache up so the app opens quicker. I just find it confusing..
Beamed in by telepathy.
shivadow said:
When using the ram booster and cache eraser, can you explain how this works because the way android works is to fill ram and cache up so the app opens quicker. I just find it confusing..
Beamed in by telepathy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, thank you so much for your answer.
If you explain more, I will answer totally.
Title updated
Dissambler said:
Hey, thank you so much for your answer.
If you explain more, I will answer totally.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey are you here?
Guys don't forget recommend us. Please some write for this topic.
Reserved
I find the junk tag on this thread ironically accurate.
Anthony820 said:
I find the junk tag on this thread ironically accurate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you commenting with such a harsh temperament? If you tell them what is missing, we will help you in the future.
Thank you
Anthony820 said:
I find the junk tag on this thread ironically accurate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you do not talking????
ekrem71 said:
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your comment. Do u have any suggestion for this App? Please answer me.
updated: PROMO codes added
Promo codes avaiable, guys please write something. We need supporting.
Update version 1.0.1
Clean full junk files.
thank u very much for this app ! keep it up
p.s:haters gonna hate ..so don't give a f**k about them .
iskanderalex222 said:
thank u very much for this app ! keep it up
p.s:haters gonna hate ..so don't give a f**k about them .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, thank you for your supporting. I need ask something about this app.
Dissambler said:
Wow, thank you for your supporting. I need ask something about this app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is is compatible with 7.1.2 ?
and i suggest that u add themes ty
iskanderalex222 said:
is is compatible with 7.1.2 ?
and i suggest that u add themes ty
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Iskender thank you for your supporting, I will add and I will add some new functions.
Updated, this new version.

Categories

Resources