Post your Antutu Benchmark Scores - LG V10 General

Its simple...I've made this Thread to whoever wants to share their Antutu Benchmark scores, also please share any modification you've done to the device, thanks:fingers-crossed:
LG V10 ***Rooted***
Stock, of course no custom ROM, kernel, etc etc available just yet...
Just freezed bunch of apps with Titanium Backup

"I don't have a **** about benchmark scores..."
*proceeds to make a thread asking for benchmark scores*

I can't load antutu or geekbench. Tells me to disable my network connection, but it still won't work
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Bootup said:
"I don't have a **** about benchmark scores..."
*proceeds to make a thread asking for benchmark scores*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeiiii!!! you earned a "like"...:highfive:
I forgot, im not a benchmark guy, if you want to make fun, go ahead, im just trying to see the performance of each device, ive seem people talking about getting 39k, this and that, why don't you just run the benchmark and post your results come on man, just for fun:fingers-crossed:

digitallure said:
I can't load antutu or geekbench. Tells me to disable my network connection, but it still won't work
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, that's weird, try rebooting the phone!!!

yoniinfante said:
Now, that's weird, try rebooting the phone!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried that too

digitallure said:
I tried that too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, try uninstalling the app and re install, and try again

yoniinfante said:
Damn, try uninstalling the app and re install, and try again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take that back, I put it in airplane mode and it's working. But still, I shouldn't have to do that...."Kanye shrug"
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

digitallure said:
I take that back, I put it in airplane mode and it's working. But still, I shouldn't have to do that...."Kanye shrug"
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah I know, still weird

I only get 50k.

mingkee said:
I only get 50k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember this benchmark runs better when phone is cold, Can you share some screenshots?

That's pretty low, as the note 4 with the right rom will do 52,000, anyone have a quadrant score to report? One stock and maybe one with xposed installed?

Got about 52,800. I didn't expect this phone to perform. It works fantastic in day-to-day use. I don't 3D game. Can't ask for much more from it (except more battery life - but removable battery is its saving grace).

Nitemare3219 said:
Got about 52,800. I didn't expect this phone to perform. It works fantastic in day-to-day use. I don't 3D game. Can't ask for much more from it (except more battery life - but removable battery is its saving grace).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For a 6 cores phone basically 2 high performance cores, these results are not bad, im coming from a Note 4 with Exynos Octa Core, this phone is much smoother, also after rooting and freezing some apps with Titanium Backup, I was able to get 27 hours and 4+ SOT, I say, once developers gets their hand on this phone, it only will get better :fingers-crossed:

Amd4life said:
That's pretty low, as the note 4 with the right rom will do 52,000, anyone have a quadrant score to report? One stock and maybe one with xposed installed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---------- Post added at 09:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:46 PM ----------
yoniinfante said:
Remember this benchmark runs better when phone is cold, Can you share some screenshots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Yikes those scores are low. The s6 edge smokes this thing with 70k plus antutu scores.

marvi0 said:
Yikes those scores are low. The s6 edge smokes this thing with 70k plus antutu scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Congrats man, you want a cookie?

yoniinfante said:
Remember this benchmark runs better when phone is cold, Can you share some screenshots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you run a successive antutu a second and then a third time back to back and post the scores.
Nobody runs a phone cold, its already warm and then they want to do more stuff.
Lets see how this thing does.
An 808 should not drop below 45k. The 810 throttles much more.

One Twelve said:
Why don't you run a successive antutu a second and then a third time back to back and post the scores.
Nobody runs a phone cold, its already warm and then they want to do more stuff.
Lets see how this thing does.
An 808 should not drop below 45k. The 810 throttles much more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not getting 45k..and i didnt mean to run the benchmark inside a freezer!!!

yoniinfante said:
Im not getting 45k..and i didnt mean to run the benchmark inside a freezer!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not on the first run, what about the third ?

Related

[Q] Question Regarding ROM "Ultimate ICS V2"

Hey there! OK before I start, please understand that I am WELL AWARE that quadrant scores don't necessarily mean a whole lot when it comes to the performance of a rom. I get that. However I do have one question regarding this one. I notice in the ...what, 3rd video test? I dunno, the one with the moon orbiting the planet. It won't go over 10FPS. This to me is not right considering how great it performs on all the other tests and also considering that my old Optimus One usually gets 55-65FPS on that exact test. I tried with the kernel that comes with the rom and also with GlaDOS 2.5 kernel, both at 1GHz and 1.2GHz and the results are exactly the same. Is this a bug? Is there a fix, or a work around to improve this? I see the nexus S scoring 2400-2700 on quadrant and with this 10FPS on that test I am still scoring 2100 or so. Any help as to why it lags on that one test would be most helpful!....well, would be SOMEWHAT helpful. A FIX would be MOST helpful lol
Thanks!
I don't think quadrant had been updated to run properly on ICS so it may not be pulling the GPU to render that scene. So you may not need a fix because what your looking at and what quadrant may be reporting could be incorrect.
With root explore go into system/lib/egl and delete eGLES_android.so then reboot and the plants will run around 56-60fps
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Esteway.619 said:
With root explore go into system/lib/egl and delete eGLES_android.so then reboot and the plants will run around 56-60fps
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks that worked! what does that file do anyway? Does deleting it have any other impact on the phone?
And it looks like you were both correct because even though the fps on that test improved, my score his exactly the same lol
Thank you for the replies!
santeana said:
Wow thanks that worked! what does that file do anyway? Does deleting it have any other impact on the phone?
And it looks like you were both correct because even though the fps on that test improved, my score his exactly the same lol
Thank you for the replies!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said. Quadrant isn't updated to know what its supposed to test.

[Discussion][Perseus Kernel][GT-I9500]

To keep Andrei from going crazy with non-development related questions, I've opened the following thread. That way we keep the development thread for development topics and this for general discussion.
Good deal.
First feature request: Fading in/out LEDs! I've pinged the dev for LightFlow, and while he can implement it on a software level, it would be supremely inefficient and probably drain the battery like crazy.
cmd512 said:
Good deal.
First feature request: Fading in/out LEDs! I've pinged the dev for LightFlow, and while he can implement it on a software level, it would be supremely inefficient and probably drain the battery like crazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually that's something which belongs in the dev thread. If anything you can just post on the issue tracker on Github, I've grown vary of XDA.
There's a new TI LED controller so I can't port the old Philips controls from the old phones. I'll rewrite it eventually but I got other things to do now.
AndreiLux said:
Actually that's something which belongs in the dev thread. If anything you can just post on the issue tracker on Github, I've grown vary of XDA.
There's a new TI LED controller so I can't port the old Philips controls from the old phones. I'll rewrite it eventually but I got other things to do now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done, posted on Github!
just got my s4 one day ago. rooted immediately, flashed omega7.0 and the latest perseus. did not touch anything on the u/v in stweak. no o/c as well. but the antutu score is so low 21000+, i thought it at least supposed to be 27000+?
i tried adam kernel, had the same result. is that normal? did i miss anything?
astoncheah said:
just got my s4 one day ago. rooted immediately, flashed omega7.0 and the latest perseus. did not touch anything on the u/v in stweak. no o/c as well. but the antutu score is so low 21000+, i thought it at least supposed to be 27000+?
i tried adam kernel, had the same result. is that normal? did i miss anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Congrats, you win the award for the first post about useless benchmark scores in this thread.
cmd512 said:
Congrats, you win the award for the first post about useless benchmark scores in this thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for you response. as i mentioned i got it only one day, without touching anything on u/v & o/c. i guess this is considered lower score than the stock one? i merely care about bench mark, i just want to know is this normal? or i need few days to let it settle down? fyi, i tried more than 10 times and it only score between 20k-21k. perhaps you can be kind enough to give me some idea rather than congrats me.
astoncheah said:
thanks for you response. as i mentioned i got it only one day, without touching anything on u/v & o/c. i guess this is considered lower score than the stock one? i merely care about bench mark, i just want to know is this normal? or i need few days to let it settle down? fyi, i tried more than 10 times and it only score between 20k-21k. perhaps you can be kind enough to give me some idea rather than congrats me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is normal for benchmark to be lower than on stock kernel all devices differ. Following the development of this kernel it has been stated that the kernel is not intended for high benchmarks but more for overall stability, smoothness and better battery life.
Benchmarks is just a number and a high benchmark does not always mean your phone is smooth and performs very well under normal user conditions.
Hope this answers your question and should I be mistaken about anything anyone welcome to rectify me on those points.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 2
xtacy1 said:
It is normal for benchmark to be lower than on stock kernel all devices differ. Following the development of this kernel it has been stated that the kernel is not intended for high benchmarks but more for overall stability, smoothness and better battery life.
Benchmarks is just a number and a high benchmark does not always mean your phone is smooth and performs very well under normal user conditions.
Hope this answers your question and should I be mistaken about anything anyone welcome to rectify me on those points.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never meant that perseus is running low on benchmark, in fact, it's the highest between chainfire's cfroot, wanam's adam. i tried all these 3 kernel, all score only between 19k-21k. i just wonder if i have accidentally limited my cpu speed? i will do a factory reset and re-test it.
again, i dont or merely care about benchmark, i just care if my s4 is running normally.
astoncheah said:
i never meant that perseus is running low on benchmark, in fact, it's the highest between chainfire's cfroot, wanam's adam. i tried all these 3 kernel, all score only between 19k-21k. i just wonder if i have accidentally limited my cpu speed? i will do a factory reset and re-test it.
again, i dont or merely care about benchmark, i just care if my s4 is running normally.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have kanged Andrei's response with respect to benchmarks.
Originally Posted by AndreiLux
Samsung cheats during benchmarks by enabling a thermal boost mode which raises the throttling temps by 10°C (90° -> 100°C). I disabled the permissions to this. Practical effects is things like Antutu will give lower scores. This is more realistic of actual performance and I will leave it as such. Benchmark freaks can enable the boost mode manually: /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/boost_mode .
The first throttling speed is 1400MHz and that's why it spends a lot of time there during benchmarking.
Effectively, overclocking on this device makes very little sense unless you can achieve more thermal headroom with undervolting. I personally couldn't get over 1.8GHz on random loads, and couldn't get over 1.7GHz on benchmarking (Antutu 31300).
Nevertheless, the option is there for people who want to stick their phones into their freezers. For everybody else, stop being concerned about numbers.
This seems to affect only a rare number of people and I still don't know the cause. Just cycle the screen once and be done with it.
jlevy73 said:
I have kanged Andrei's response with respect to benchmarks.
Originally Posted by AndreiLux
Samsung cheats during benchmarks by enabling a thermal boost mode which raises the throttling temps by 10°C (90° -> 100°C). I disabled the permissions to this. Practical effects is things like Antutu will give lower scores. This is more realistic of actual performance and I will leave it as such. Benchmark freaks can enable the boost mode manually: /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/boost_mode .
The first throttling speed is 1400MHz and that's why it spends a lot of time there during benchmarking.
Effectively, overclocking on this device makes very little sense unless you can achieve more thermal headroom with undervolting. I personally couldn't get over 1.8GHz on random loads, and couldn't get over 1.7GHz on benchmarking (Antutu 31300).
Nevertheless, the option is there for people who want to stick their phones into their freezers. For everybody else, stop being concerned about numbers.
This seems to affect only a rare number of people and I still don't know the cause. Just cycle the screen once and be done with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"This seems to affect only a rare number of people and I still don't know the cause" guess i am one of them:silly:
did you guys note the download link for perseus alpha 4 rc1 on andrei github? , dont flash it unless you know whats in there
edit: just flashed it (couldnt resist). based on the newer sources it seems, camera works fine with latest cam firmware
lets wait for Andrei release......build seems to be a release candidate....so its should not be for long....
bala_gamer said:
did you guys note the download link for perseus alpha 4 rc1 on andrei github? , dont flash it unless you know whats in there
edit: just flashed it (couldnt resist). based on the newer sources it seems, camera works fine with latest cam firmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing bro but i'm too stupid to find the link would you mind sharing more please?:victory:
update: found it: deleted. sorry
astoncheah said:
just got my s4 one day ago. rooted immediately, flashed omega7.0 and the latest perseus. did not touch anything on the u/v in stweak. no o/c as well. but the antutu score is so low 21000+, i thought it at least supposed to be 27000+?
i tried adam kernel, had the same result. is that normal? did i miss anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I received mine yesterday, rooted, flashed doc rom to remove bloatware, flashed perseus kernel.
I ran a few antutu and I was getting 27-28k without changing any setting.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
@GSeeker
Pls remove the link since we dont know the nature of the version or lets wait unitl andrei unveils it.
bala_gamer said:
did you guys note the download link for perseus alpha 4 rc1 on andrei github? , dont flash it unless you know whats in there
edit: just flashed it (couldnt resist). based on the newer sources it seems, camera works fine with latest cam firmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Power, What rom are you running? I suspect it's rom related.
I'm using omega 7, one of the user experienced the same as mine. Going to flash new rom.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
astoncheah said:
just got my s4 one day ago. rooted immediately, flashed omega7.0 and the latest perseus. did not touch anything on the u/v in stweak. no o/c as well. but the antutu score is so low 21000+, i thought it at least supposed to be 27000+?
i tried adam kernel, had the same result. is that normal? did i miss anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With Omega / Perseus, is your camera still working????
Sent from my GT-I9500 (Hassan Khalid Malik) using xda premium
HassanM said:
With Omega / Perseus, is your camera still working????
Sent from my GT-I9500 (Hassan Khalid Malik) using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From recovery flash Perseus kernel + Camera Fix https://www.dropbox.com/s/20kyqg154h8w198/camera-ISP-fw.MEAplusFix.zip
Then reboot. Your camera should be working.

Low benchmark scores after franco kernel r33

i used to get around 32k in antutu and around 18k in quadrant before franco kernel r33 but now i am getting around 24k and 11k respectively i highlt doubt this is due to kernel (i didnt screw up anything (no custom roms nothing...)) can some confirm this ?? plzz
Why does it matter? Does the phone still run good? Can you notice any difference while using your phone normally?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Kreateablaze said:
Why does it matter? Does the phone still run good? Can you notice any difference while using your phone normally?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in practical sense the phone works perfect apps run smoothly and battery life is awesome (5-6hrs)...but theoritical sense why did the scores become less ?? did franco limit the processor speed or something??
Benchmarks scores Dont mean anything at all
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
nemofbaby2010 said:
Benchmarks scores Dont mean anything at all
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sir , can u plz run antutu from ur phone (i.e if ur using franco kernel)? and tell me ur score i know this may sound childish and geeky whatever u call it but it is still important for me
roydondsa said:
in practical sense the phone works perfect apps run smoothly and battery life is awesome (5-6hrs)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This bit is the only thing you should be caring about...
The 'score' is meaningless. Let it go, uninstall any benchmark apps and don't bother running a test ever again.
Put it this way...if you suddenly scored 234069823987693827469823764 after flashing a new kernel, but performance and battery actually got worse, which one would you prefer?
eddiehk6 said:
This bit is the only thing you should be caring about...
The 'score' is meaningless. Let it go, uninstall any benchmark apps and don't bother running a test ever again.
Put it this way...if you suddenly scored 234069823987693827469823764 after flashing a new kernel, but performance and battery actually got worse, which one would you prefer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok sir just uninstalled antutu and other benchmarks
roydondsa said:
i used to get around 32k in antutu and around 18k in quadrant before franco kernel r33 but now i am getting around 24k and 11k respectively i highlt doubt this is due to kernel (i didnt screw up anything (no custom roms nothing...)) can some confirm this ?? plzz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Franciso explained that he had decreased the CPU temp limit before thermal throttling, that could explain your lower score (earlier thermal throttle)... Check also your max CPU freq.
Let cool down your phone before you run Antutu and see, or play with the thermal settings (raise a bit the CPU temp before thermal throttling, core also).
The user is in its right to know why he have a lower score in benches between two different version of a kernel, whatever if a bench is useful or useless... Obviously if all is smooth and run perfectly for you, it's the principal.
nexus 5 is high end device, benchmark score doesn't effect the performance of device using any kernel.
i never experience any lag on my nexus, i always get different score in antutu.
r32 I got around 32k with antutu now I get around 29k on r33 but battery life is so incredible I'm willing to sacrifice benchmark points useless in day to day use .... isn't benchmarking moslty about bragging?
thank you very much

Can anyone help me understand?

Can anyone help me understand this?
What program are you using? think the antutu benchmark is screwed right now as it CANT detect multiple cpus for our device...
ars0n said:
What program are you using? think the antutu benchmark is screwed right now as it CANT detect multiple cpus for our device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I was using. Any recommendations for a good benchmark?
I believe a lot of people are using the 3dmark for benching... honestly, i benched my phone when I first got it and it was around 58k I rarely have ever seen it higher. I was reading a while back that the antutu program cant see all of our cores correctly and thats why we get such low scores atm. I havent used 3dmark on this phone so cant really give you a comparison to mine. Are you super anal like me and just want to see the max capabilities of your phone vs others or just for piece of mind to know your phone is rock solid/fast? I go for both =D I want to see what my phone is like compared to others, but in the long run i think that does more damage than good. All these notes should be running identical and we dont know what settings and or apps other people have when they run the benchmark, the only for sure would be to make sure that every single person that is benchmarking is on a stock phone with NO tweaks or apps installed other than the benchmarking software..then compare..
---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:36 PM ----------
Also, if you go to the main samsung note 5 page on XDA there is a benchmarking forum you can read through to get a better idea.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/general/antutu-benchmark-t3253521
There is a link to it, but, I think you might end up driving your self crazy like I did going through it all.. lol..
ars0n said:
I believe a lot of people are using the 3dmark for benching... honestly, i benched my phone when I first got it and it was around 58k I rarely have ever seen it higher. I was reading a while back that the antutu program cant see all of our cores correctly and thats why we get such low scores atm. I havent used 3dmark on this phone so cant really give you a comparison to mine. Are you super anal like me and just want to see the max capabilities of your phone vs others or just for piece of mind to know your phone is rock solid/fast? I go for both =D I want to see what my phone is like compared to others, but in the long run i think that does more damage than good. All these notes should be running identical and we dont know what settings and or apps other people have when they run the benchmark, the only for sure would be to make sure that every single person that is benchmarking is on a stock phone with NO tweaks or apps installed other than the benchmarking software..then compare..
---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:36 PM ----------
Also, if you go to the main samsung note 5 page on XDA there is a benchmarking forum you can read through to get a better idea.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/general/antutu-benchmark-t3253521
There is a link to it, but, I think you might end up driving your self crazy like I did going through it all.. lol..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I really dint cate about the score, I just want to make sure that I don't have a problem. Dunce my multi core, and 3d don't appear to be skirting at all.
My antutu also would NOT run the garden scene correctly with out crashing after a few runs. had to reinstall to work and then eventually said F it.. lol..
Its hard to say when things happen to the phone that slow it down, most of the time it is an app... but the best option if unsure is to master reset and install only that app that is giving you issues and see if it fixes it. Also paying attention to comments on the app to see if any other users might be having the same problems before doing that master reset..
I usually find a new game or a game I know is graphic intensive, like hearthstone, GTA games or other and if the phone plays it fine, then no worries!

antutu benchmark score while running AICP

When I first got my moto x pure 2015 my phone was scoring anywhere from 71000 - 72000. That was on stock. I just installed aicp for the 2nd time a couple of nights ago and it scored 78268 on antutu benchmark. That's awesome performance with this phone. I've installed every custom rom for this phone and aicp has gave me the most solid all around good scores along with the performance to match. I love every ROM that has been made for this phone though. I know that chosing aosp/cm based ROMs may make you go without certain features such as moto voice and display but it always makes up for all of that and then some in the long run with a lot better performance and some bad ass tweaks
jlbuck6212 said:
When I first got my moto x pure 2015 my phone was scoring anywhere from 71000 - 72000. That was on stock. I just installed aicp for the 2nd time a couple of nights ago and it scored 78268 on antutu benchmark. That's awesome performance with this phone. I've installed every custom rom for this phone and aicp has gave me the most solid all around good scores along with the performance to match. I love every ROM that has been made for this phone though. I know that chosing aosp/cm based ROMs may make you go without certain features such as moto voice and display but it always makes up for all of that and then some in the long run with a lot better performance and some bad ass tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trupure with Frankenclark kernel (performance settings) will give you the same results
jlbuck6212 said:
When I first got my moto x pure 2015 my phone was scoring anywhere from 71000 - 72000. That was on stock. I just installed aicp for the 2nd time a couple of nights ago and it scored 78268 on antutu benchmark. That's awesome performance with this phone. I've installed every custom rom for this phone and aicp has gave me the most solid all around good scores along with the performance to match. I love every ROM that has been made for this phone though. I know that chosing aosp/cm based ROMs may make you go without certain features such as moto voice and display but it always makes up for all of that and then some in the long run with a lot better performance and some bad ass tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jt got a 114472 using purenexus rom
Google~Android said:
Jt got a 114472 using purenexus rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GEESUS! Do you have to carry a Fire Extinguisher with that?
goolac said:
GEESUS! Do you have to carry a Fire Extinguisher with that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha itnwas a flawed test.. I posted. Pics in acip thread...
Google~Android said:
Haha itnwas a flawed test.. I posted. Pics in acip thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you get the PureNexus ROM, link please!
iNerdBR said:
Where did you get the PureNexus ROM, link please!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
??? what he said ???
iNerdBR said:
Where did you get the PureNexus ROM, link please!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cant share check the acip thread.. Theres a link within the last 8 pages
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24438995911971491
found
Google~Android said:
Jt got a 114472 using purenexus rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How??! I have Pure nexus and i scored 79k... Do i have to use an earlier version of pure nexus or what?
used to get around 60k on truepure and frankenkernel. now 72k with CM13. how do you get to 78k ? Can Xposed lower scores ?
Running tru pure ROM frankenkernel scored 118,000 thought it was flawed also but still fun lol
Optimusman said:
Running tru pure ROM frankenkernel scored 118,000 thought it was flawed also but still fun lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by flawed really? And could you upload a screenshot or something?
I just ran on a stock odex build that is in the dev forum and I got was 59839. Is that bad?
barakisbrown said:
I just ran on a stock odex build that is in the dev forum and I got was 59839. Is that bad?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get around 72000 on stock. What are the individual scores (GPU, CPU, UX, etc..)? Also, if the device is really hot, it could be throttling the CPU.
quakeaz said:
I get around 72000 on stock. What are the individual scores (GPU, CPU, UX, etc..)? Also, if the device is really hot, it could be throttling the CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3D : 22127
UX : 20040
CPU : 13622
RAM : 4050
This is a 16GB version and I do have exposed and systemless root also
barakisbrown said:
3D : 22127
UX : 20040
CPU : 13622
RAM : 4050
This is a 16GB version and I do have exposed and systemless root also
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could be throttling, scores look fairly normal, except CPU is quite low. Is the phone very hot when you are testing?
Overall: 73241
3D: 21389
UX: 26110
CPU: 20508
RAM: 5234
It did get warm during it yes.
Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk
akeflo said:
What do you mean by flawed really? And could you upload a screenshot or something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshots of benchmarks
Optimusman said:
Screenshots of benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy ****! OC Cpu? But i still don't understand how you got that score? I've tried Truepure but i only get 70-80k. I see the UX score is more than twice as high than it usually is. Did you do something to make that score higher or what?
---------- Post added at 09:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:34 AM ----------
barakisbrown said:
It did get warm during it yes.
Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to cool it down for a while by not using it at all and then test it again when it's cool, there will be difference.

Categories

Resources