Here is a very detailed and thorough review and comparison of the Exynos version of Note 3 (SM-N9000).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eag1F9WXvVo
It is in Russian but you can observe many things! I don't speak Russian but here is what I gathered:
The screen is brighter that the previous Notes also if you look closely you can see that during the 1,28 hr testing, the Note 3 has with left 84% battery while Note 2 with 87% while Note 3 had been used more than Note 2! Not bad I guess! Also here are the benchmarks scores:
Antutu: 34427
Ice Storm score: Maxed out
Graphics score: Maxed out
Physics score: Maxed out
Graphics test 1: 59.9 fps
Graphics test 2: 49.4 fps
Physics test: 46.1 fps
Anyone who speaks Russian please feel free to state any useful info from this video review.
Also here is the source link where you can see some images and videos from Note 3:
http://rozetka.com.ua/news-articles-promotions/articles/80003/obzor_samsung_galaxy_note3.html
ps. If this thread is wrongly posted then fell free to correct it, I first searched in the forum but I concluded that It will more appropriate to post a new thread.
^^ Good find.
Cheers!
Related
Doing a 5 part series at The Droid Demos Check it out!
Welcome to the second part in a 5 part series of Android performance benchmarking apps. Neocore is an app to measure the OpenGL-ES 1.1, or for those confused, 3D graphics performance. You get to watch a cool video in the process! It then reports the FPS that your phone can display. Download today for a great app to compare Android phones and different ROMs!
Stay tuned for the continuation of the Android Performance Benchmark Series.
Part 2/5 - Necore for 3D Graphics Performance
For Part 1, check out Benchmark Pi for CPU Performance Benchmarking
Linpack – Most Popular Android CPU Performance Test [Performance Series]
Doing a 5 part series at The Droid Demos Check it out!
Welcome to the third part in a 5 part series of Android performance benchmarking apps. Linpack, like Benchmark Pi, is an app to measure CPU performance by having your Android phone calculate pi. It reports your performance in millions of floating point operations per second (MFLOPS). Download today for a great app to compare Android phones, compare ROMs, or just try to beat the high scores of other users.Ms!
Stay tuned for the continuation of the Android Performance Benchmark Series.
For Part 3, check out Linpack, the Most Popular CPU Performance Test
For Part 2, check out Necore for 3D Graphics Performance
For Part 1, check out Benchmark Pi for CPU Performance Benchmarking
For all those interested in developing for the Exynos 5250, to be used in the Nexus 10, Samsung have kindly launched, for a modest sum, the Arndale development board.
http://www.arndaleboard.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
It has already been benchmarked on the GL Benchmark site, Mali T-604 is powerful, but it doesn't look like it will give the A6X any headaches.
http://www.glbenchmark.com/phonedet...o25&D=Samsung+Arndale+Board&testgroup=overall
Need proper benchmark done on a final device. Definitely can't think that dev board drivers are optimized properly. It's running on 4.0.4. We should get more details once we do a benchmark on a final version of N10.
hot_spare said:
Need proper benchmark done on a final device. Definitely can't think that dev board drivers are optimized properly. It's running on 4.0.4. We should get more details once we do a benchmark on a final version of N10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jelly Bean didn't do much for graphics benchmarks, IRC. The low-level test won't change much, if you do a comparison with the iPad 3, you can see that Power VR SGX MP4 is a beast in terms of pixel / texture fill rate, which the A6X will improve further. The consensus is that shader power is the most important, as long as there is sufficient fill rate performance, and the Mali T-604 combined with its good bandwidth should be as capable as the A6X in real world games, the only question will developers optimise a game just 1 tablet?
Turbotab said:
Jelly Bean didn't do much for graphics benchmarks, IRC. The low-level test won't change much, if you do a comparison with the iPad 3, you can see that Power VR SGX MP4 is a beast in terms of pixel / texture fill rate, which the A6X will improve further. The consensus is that shader power is the most important, as long as there is sufficient fill rate performance, and the Mali T-604 combined with its good bandwidth should be as capable as the A6X in real world games, the only question will developers optimise a game just 1 tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not saying that JB will suddenly improve GPU benchmarks, but a lot of improvement can happen due to driver/firmware optimization.
Let me give you real example: Do you recall GLbenchmark Egypt offscreen scores GS2 when it came out initially? It was getting around 40-42fps initially.
[Source: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4686/samsung-galaxy-s-2-international-review-the-best-redefined/17 ]
The same GS2 after a few months was getting 60-65fps under same test.
Source 1: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6022/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review-att-and-tmobile-usa-variants/4
Source 2: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5811/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview
It's a clear 50% improvement in performance done primarily through driver optimization.
Also, check the fill rate properly in the Arndale board test. It's much less than what is expected. ARM says that Mali-T604 clocked at 500MHz should get a fill rate of 2 GPixels/s. It's actually showing just about 60% of what it should be delivering.
http://blogs.arm.com/multimedia/353-of-philosophy-and-when-is-a-pixel-not-a-pixel/
Also check this slide : http://semiaccurate.com/assets/uploads/2012/03/Samsung_Exynos_5_Mali.jpg
Samsung says 2.1 GPixels/s @ GPU clocked at 533MHz. Obviously the results don't match with quoted numbers. Difference is a lot actually.
I believe the final Nexus 10 numbers will be quite different from what we see now. Let's wait for final production models.
Here's the link to the benchmark: https://www.google.ro/url?sa=t&rct=...=x43gcaDR5nDEc6TsKXNpoQ&bvm=bv.54176721,d.bGE
I think it's a nice bench for the CPU and GPU. It looks stunning, also.
My GT-I9505 S600 scores 160.000 on High settings.
Scene 1 Frozen Canyon = 62229
Scene 2 Clearing the Road = 51460
Scene 3 Rio Rampage = 46193
Bronze award.
For comparison, an S800 Note 3 scores ~600k. Also, a Nexus 4 scores 270k, but here we have to take into consideration the much lower screen resolution.
Post your scores.
Use search button before making Thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2191834
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2415005
Mod Edit
Please refer to the links given by Disturbed™
Thread closed
malybru
Forum Moderator
Has anyone else flashed a custom rom and you're note 5 is scoring a lot lower than stock?
I will say this... I know that antutu has overhauled it's scoring etc. I went from top score to second to mate 8 once it updated to the 6.0.1 Antutu (not my firmware of course) I get around 81 grand average. Unless I let it sit and cool and all the other favorable higher score solutions. I can when it's cold hit second. But yeah. The new antutu in my opinion does not fair well for exynos as it used to. Either that or these notes have just had their day. Lmao.
Hi guys,
I purchased the Galaxy Note 10 and I am happy with it.
I decided to run some benchmarks and I was really disappointed. But I also watched some benchmark videos on YouTube and these scores are not bad at all.
Indeed, my scores aren't even close to the scores in the videos.
What should I do and please give some ideas.
P.S: I posted two pictures. 1) Benchmark with "High Performance" enabled
2) High Performance disabled
Do you have a link to the videos you are referring to?
I just ran this for my Note 10+ and I am seeing the following...
Optimized Performance:
Single-Core - 3410
Multi-Core - 10599
High Performance:
Single-Core - 3465
Multi-Core - 11028
Link: https://youtu.be/ZNa7nfRq4OY
Time: 4:16
12gb of RAM?
digital0verdose said:
Do you have a link to the videos you are referring to?
I just ran this for my Note 10+ and I am seeing the following...
Optimized Performance:
Single-Core - 3410
Multi-Core - 10599
High Performance:
Single-Core - 3465
Multi-Core - 11028
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://youtu.be/ZNa7nfRq4OY
Time: 4:16