Related
As an experiment I am trying to rebuild some standard android applications and replace them in system/app on the G1. I have been through all the steps to get the source code and build for the dream platform and have built the various .apk files of interest (e.g. AlarmClock.apk, Browser.apk etc)
To put the files on the device I delete the old .apk and .odex files and copy my newly built .apk file on to the device. However when I try to run the application it crashes with the following message.
The application Alarm Clock (process com.android.alarmclock) has stopped unexpectedly. Please try again.
I know that replacing the applications like this is possible, because the AutoRotating Browser build works fine when copies over in this manner.
I'm using JF1.31 (RC8)
My initial reaction was that I was not signing the applications properly but having read some posts I think the default built .apk should have the right key already in it.
Another theory I have is that perhaps the applications from the head of the source tree are not compatible with the RC8 (or RC30) Android OS releases. Can anyone tell me how to get the source tree which corresponds to this baseline, I've done some reading around but cannot figure it out. I presume I need to do a repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platofrm/manifest.git -b BASELINE but I can't figure out what BASELINE should be.
Many thanks in advance for any help you can give me!!!
There are some branches in android sources:
master
cupcake
release-1.0
Apps from the first two will not run on default G1, you need to reinstall a whole system. I think by default, following google docs you'll get master. So you need to download a release-1.0 sources.
I may be wrong, but that is what I'm see from my experience.
Thanks for that, I'll get the 1.0 branch downloaded and have a go with that.
Cheers for your help!
I was also trying to recompile some of the built-in apps, specifically the browser, but I can't even get it to build. I get a bunch of import errors, stating that it can't find some of the android libraries, such as android.net.http.AndroidHttpClient, android.os.AsyncTask, etc. I've got the android.jar from the SDK in my build path, and it finds some of them, such as android.webkit.URLUtil.
Can anyone shed some light on what I need to do to get it to see the missing libraries? Thanks.
UndeadCretin said:
Thanks for that, I'll get the 1.0 branch downloaded and have a go with that.
Cheers for your help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are around a dozen build breaks in release-1.0... all of them are due to missing header #includes in various .c and .h files. So, when it doesn't work, don't give up. Fix the breaks and everything will build properly.
Are you resigning the .apk files? Cuz you have to do that for them to work correctly.
Koush said:
There are around a dozen build breaks in release-1.0... all of them are due to missing header #includes in various .c and .h files. So, when it doesn't work, don't give up. Fix the breaks and everything will build properly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep I fixed these problems but I have now hit upon the following problem:
(unknown): error 17: Field android.hardware.SensorManager.LIGHT_NO_MOON has changed value from 0.0010f to 0.001f
******************************
You have tried to change the API from what has been previously released in
an SDK. Please fix the errors listed above.
******************************
I've been in and modified SensorManager back to 0.0010f and that let me build get further but I hit the same error again later in the build.
Given that release-1.0 should be a stable branch is it normal to get all these build issues?
Managed to fix the java issue by modifying public_api.xml. Then hit several more C++ problems which I fixed and finally I can build the lot!
Just tried building the AlarmClock application and running on the G1 and it works fine. Thanks everyone for your help!
>Managed to fix the java issue by modifying public_api.xml. Then hit several more C++ problems which I fixed and finally I can build the lot!
Can you write, what did you fix?
^ Agreed, let us know which files need modifying and what needs doing, i've been trying to get my release-1.0 build root working too!
Alternatively, UndeadCretin, could you build the firmware (release-1.0) with a modified framework-res i can send you?
Ok, I managed to compile it without any editing of xml.
Just added stdlib, string, vector headers to dozen of cpp/h.
worry said:
>Managed to fix the java issue by modifying public_api.xml. Then hit several more C++ problems which I fixed and finally I can build the lot!
Can you write, what did you fix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To fix the java issue, I modified frameworks/base/core/java/android/hardware/SensorManager to change the LIGHT_NO_MOON value to 0.0010f (from 0.001f) and in out/target/common/obj/PACKAGING I modified the <field name="LIGHT_NO_MOON" to have value-"0.0010f">
After this there were several other c++ files which were missing relevant includes. I'm afraid I didn't keep a note of these so cannot provide much detail but mostly they were missing one of the following
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "string.h"
#include "stdio.h"
I think one file needed the following include
#include <string>
and there were a couple of other files that needed other includes. The best way to find these is to google for the function name that isn't building and you should be able to find the appropriate include (that's how I did it).
Hope that helps a bit!
were you able to repo sync after adding the local_manifest.xml?
ximonx said:
were you able to repo sync after adding the local_manifest.xml?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did try that previously but it didn't work. I don't think the relevant files for the dream build are available in the release-1.0 branch. This wasn't a problem for me since I'm only interested in building the applications which work fine with the generic build.
I would like to do the same for the mms application. Could you give me the steps or a link how to do it? I mean do I need the whole sources from android platform to do it? How can I just compile one application?
Phlogiston said:
I would like to do the same for the mms application. Could you give me the steps or a link how to do it? I mean do I need the whole sources from android platform to do it? How can I just compile one application?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I downloaded the whole Android source (the release-1.0 branch) and compiled the lot. It may be possible to just build the individual application but I do not know how. It is not vital to build for the dream platform if you only care about the applications since they will work fine with the generic build.
So the basic steps to start are:
Get yourself a Linux or Mac OS platform (I use Ubuntu running in VMWare on my XP box).
Follow the instructions here: http://source.android.com/download but when you come to repo init add the flag -b release-1.0
Fix various build problems
When recompiling individual apps to replace system apps is there a way of just building a single application or does the entire thing need making?
ximonx said:
When recompiling individual apps to replace system apps is there a way of just building a single application or does the entire thing need making?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My experience is that you have to do the whole thing if you are building from source. There is one way I know of to get around this, which is to use baksmali and smali.
Just to be clear, making the entire thing = build from source root?
ximonx said:
Just to be clear, making the entire thing = build from source root?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are asking me--yes, that's what I mean. Make sure to build for dream-open as the target (it's generic by default).
Hi, so I'm a student learning Android app development and trying to modify the AOSP calendar to fit my needs so I downloaded the source code from git and made a project with 2.2 FroYo as the basis through Eclipse with ADT and all but I ran into a problem. So I run into:
android.provider.Calendar cannot be resolved into a variable
I did some research and found that the SDK apparently does not have the calendar code nor the database which is why I am running into these issues. So I learned from here jimblackler[dot]net/blog/?p=151 all that. He does have a solution except I have no idea what he is saying. He posted a bunch of code but I have no idea where that code is supposed to go in and I dont understand what he is trying to do with "content://calendar/calendars"
So I just decided to ignore the errors and obviously I couldn't compile it through eclipse so I made an unsigned apk and tried to install it unto the Emulator via ADB but as an unsigned apk it would not let me install it I tried to sign it by going through google's developer site but I am at lost again. I'm a noob to these things unfortunately..
I was wondering if anybody could help me out and point me in a good direction, I would be eternally grateful. Thanks.
P.S. sorry if I was being vague about the google's developer site and source code site but as a newbie I can't post links properly
Edit: I've created a xposed module which works with the banking app version 1.7.1 see post below.
---------------------------------------------------
Edit: The changes needed to work with the latest version of the app (1.7.1) are listed in a post below below.
---------------------------------------------------
*There was a error in the diff file. I've uploaded the correct version. Also this patch will definitely not work with the latest version of the app.*
I managed to patch the Barclays mobile banking app version 1.4.2 to make it work with cyanagonmod 10.0 and cyanogenmod 11.
I realize that the current version on play store is 1.7.1 but I haven't updated to the latest version yet. If you do try the latest version please let me know if it differs greatly from the current version in it's root checks
I'm not going to attach the patched apk since using banking app from a stranger on the internet is really not a smart thing . Instead I will detail the work I did which hopefully someone else will find useful.
This guide is geared towards more technical people who already have some experience with android development. It will not give a detailed step by step how to, rather a general information about the process.
Obfuscation methods used in the app
The app obfuscates the names of some but not all of the namespaces/classes/methods which can stump some decompilers.
It seems to generously sprinkle useless switch statements and loops which does nothing but make the code appear way more complicated than it really is. I would guess quite a lot of the bulk in the code is coming through these dummy statements. smali2java-toolkit was of great help to figure this out.
All strings in the app have been encrypted by a simple xor algorithm which is then decrypted at run time just before they are used:
for example rather than
Code:
myfunction(“Hello world”)
the code writes something in the sort of:
Code:
myfunction(decrypt(“Juqqdxidqw”, 'x'))
The decryption function is a static method 'bЮЮЮЮЮЮ' in the class appears to be 'rrrrrr.srrrrr' (the method/class/namespace names are obfusecated)
I extracted the decompiled code from this method to write a console application which let me decrypt any string in the application:
Code:
static String decrypt(String crypStr, char keyChar) {
char[] arrayOfChar1 = crypStr.toCharArray();
char[] arrayOfChar2 = new char[arrayOfChar1.length];
for (int i = 0; i < arrayOfChar1.length; i++)
{
int j = keyChar ^ arrayOfChar1[i];
arrayOfChar2[i] = ((char)j);
}
return new String(arrayOfChar2);
}
Anti root methods used in the app
Checking for 'test-keys' string in the build tag. (/system/build.prop file)
Checking for superuser related package/apk files.
Checking for superuser hider package/apk files.
Checking for existance of 'su' binary
Attempting to execute 'su' binaryThe above checks are done both in the java/dex code and in a native code library.
Defeating the anti-root methods in Java/dex code:
The Java code is fairly easy defeat since changing the strings of the apk/file names which are checked as root related will make it think that no 'bad' apps are on the phone.
A bulk of checks happen in the isRootedDevice method of the com.barclays.android.application.BMBApplication class. While it checks for quite a lot of apk's, for my particular purpose I only needed to patch 2 lines in the method:
Smali file line 306 – which starts the checks for “test-keys” string in the build tag.
Smali file line 407 – which start the check for the string “/system/app/Superuser.apk”.The next method in the same class 'runRootCommand' attempts to execute 'su'
Smali line: 956 – which contains the string “su” which will be passed to java.lang.Runtime.exec
A (mostly?) duplicate of the isRootedDevice function exists in the com.barclays.android.container.DeviceData the relevant lines are :
smali file line 1237: "test-keys" string check
smali file line 1271: "/system/app/Superuser.apk" file checkAll of the above checks can easily be defeated by changing the the string so that it will check for a non existent package or file.
Keep in mind that all the strings listed above are in encrypted form. You can use the decrypt function listed above to decode them. I found the key char/byte needed to decrypt a given string is in the very next line to the one containing the encrypted string.
Defeating the anti-root methods in Native library
From what I can see the exact same tests which were done in the Java code is repeated in the native code library 'libtest_ndk.so'. As this check appears to form part of the authentication mechanism i don't believe it's possible to simply stop this check from being called from the Java code.
Also the com.barclays.android.container.sampler.SharedLibraryLoader which loads the native library appears to be doing some kind of checksum validation. While this probably could be easily worked around, disassembling an arm shared library was non trivial for me.
My approach was to write another native library which would hook into all the system calls such as 'system' 'stat' 'fopen', '__system_property_get' and redirect any operations to non existent targets, or change the return value. This achieves the same thing as what was done for the java code.
I put in some extra code into the smali classes to load my native library and to call it's initializer with the path to the actual native library.
Basic steps performed to patch the library:
Use apktool to decompile the original apk.
Code:
apktool d barclays.apk barclays
Use smali2java as helper to understand the code: This tool cannot decompile the critical check functions due to obfuscation. However it made it easier to understand the smali files generated by the apktool.
Patch the smali files to work around the checks as described above.
Build the hooking native library seperately
Code:
~/adt/adt-bundle-linux-x86_64-20131030/sdk/tools/android update project --path . --target android-19
ndk-build
Include the hooking shared library into the lib/armeabi of the decompiled package and change the smali files to load the new shared library.
Use apktool to rebuild the apk.
Code:
Apktool b barclays barclays.apk
Sign the apk from using your own key.
Create keystore:
Code:
keytool.exe -genkey -v -keystore my-release-key.keystore -alias release -keyalg RSA -keysize 2048 -validity 20000
Sign Keystore:
Code:
jarsigner -verbose -sigalg SHA1withRSA -digestalg SHA1 -keystore my-release-key.keystore barclays.apk release
Attached is the code for the hook library native project and the diff for the smali changes. Please note that this is for the smali files for generated by apktool (v1.5.2) for the version 1.4.2 of the Barclays mobile banking app.
For Users of other ROMs/SU applications and root hiders.
The app checks for a lot of common packages which I did not bother to patch since I don't use them, but if you do then you should put fixes for all those package/file names in both the smali and native code hook library.
A non exhustive list of files it check are:
Code:
/system/bin/amphoras
/system/bin/su
/system/xbin/su
/system/app/superuser.apk
/data/data/com.amphoras.hidemyroot
/data/data/eu.chainfire.supersu
/data/data/stericson.busybox
/data/data/stericson.busybox.donate
/data/data/com.jrummy.busybox.installer.pro
/data/data/com.jrummy.busybox.installer
/data/data/com.rootuninstaller.free
/data/data/com.rootuninstaller
Hey i will try this out shortly and post a APK (whether you use it or not thats up to you, but i am well known in the xperia play section of this website and should be trusted, Still its up to you.)
EDIT: well i am not a android developer, i can follow almost all this post except the bits about the native library any chance of a bit more information
specifically this bit "Include the hooking shared library into the lib/armeabi of the decompiled package and change the smali files to load the new shared library."
i assume that means just simply copy the built lib file in to that folder then include the file in the code somewhere? where do i do that to?
Sorry about the late reply but I just saw this message.
fma965 said:
EDIT: well i am not a android developer, i can follow almost all this post except the bits about the native library any chance of a bit more information
specifically this bit "Include the hooking shared library into the lib/armeabi of the decompiled package and change the smali files to load the new shared library."
i assume that means just simply copy the built lib file in to that folder then include the file in the code somewhere? where do i do that to?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's pretty much correct. There is already a 'libtest_ndk.so' file in the lib/armeabi folder of the apk. You just have to build my code from the zip file to get the libhooktest.so, which should then be copied into the lib/armeabi folder alongside the libtest_ndk.so.
Edit: Not sure if this is enough instructions. I'm just not good at writing instructions. Steps you need to build the native library are in my post. If you need more info i suggest about building the library http://code.google.com/p/awesomeguy/wiki/JNITutorial#Setup_Environment is a good
Afterwards you have to do the modifications I've listed in the diff to the .smali files.
But i have some bad news about this patch:
The diff file i have attached in the post is wrong. I've mistakenly uploaded the patch to reverse the changes i did . I will update the post with the correct diff file.
It will only work for Barclays app version 1.4.2. it will definitely not work for the latest version of the app which is 1.7.1.
I'm currently going through the code of 1.7.1 I've made some headway into the code but there I'm quite way off from getting it to work.
If you wish I can give you a copy of the original 1.4.2 of Barclays app, the built lib file and the patched app. I would recommend against using the patched app blindly but it might make it easier to figure out the changes i did. I would rather not upload them to xda though.
HiddenRambler said:
Sorry about the late reply but I just saw this message.
That's pretty much correct. There is already a 'libtest_ndk.so' file in the lib/armeabi folder of the apk. You just have to build my code from the zip file to get the libhooktest.so, which should then be copied into the lib/armeabi folder alongside the libtest_ndk.so.
Edit: Not sure if this is enough instructions. I'm just not good at writing instructions. Steps you need to build the native library are in my post. If you need more info i suggest about building the library http://code.google.com/p/awesomeguy/wiki/JNITutorial#Setup_Environment is a good
Afterwards you have to do the modifications I've listed in the diff to the .smali files.
But i have some bad news about this patch:
The diff file i have attached in the post is wrong. I've mistakenly uploaded the patch to reverse the changes i did . I will update the post with the correct diff file.
It will only work for Barclays app version 1.4.2. it will definitely not work for the latest version of the app which is 1.7.1.
I'm currently going through the code of 1.7.1 I've made some headway into the code but there I'm quite way off from getting it to work.
If you wish I can give you a copy of the original 1.4.2 of Barclays app, the built lib file and the patched app. I would recommend against using the patched app blindly but it might make it easier to figure out the changes i did. I would rather not upload them to xda though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries about the late reply, yeah you basically told me what i assumed it was i had to do, however when i was trying to do it i didn't have a 1.4.2 apk so was trying ot use 1.7.X and obviously failed .
Yeah the modifications to smali files is easy well when you know what your changing xD
if you could upload the apk for 1.4.2 that would be great, i would assume that as long as the signature matches the official apk its untampered, your modified one will obviously be signed with a different signature though.
:cyclops:
Good news. I've managed to get latest version 1.7.1 patched . I will try to post the patch information this weekend. In the meantime i suggest anyone interested download a copy from the play store and keep a backup of the apk in case they release a new version.
Fix for latest version of the mobile banking app (version 1.7.1)
I've figured out the changes required for the v1.7.1 of the app which is the latest version as of this post.
Changes from the old 1.4.2 are:
Almost all the classes in the app are now obfuscated, whereas before only some of the core class names were obfuscated.
The string encryption has changed. rather than a single encryption function it now uses a group of functions to perform the encryption. rrrrrr/vuuuvu class seems to manage invoking the proper decryptor based on the arguments.
All root checking is now done via the native library.
Native library now does some checks as soon as it's loaded before any methods are called.
The last change is a big problem since its not possible to do the patching of the dll after loading it as was done before. The onload/init of the dll exits the whole application as soon as it detects the phone is rooted.
My solution was to use a modified version of the 'crazy_linker' custom loader library which comes with the ndk to load the library into memory without invoking it's onload/init functions. This lets us hook into the necessary functions before they are called.
I've attached the smali changes as a diff and the new native hook library in this post.
As a side note I think the version 1.4.2 is a far better version. Why on earth would a banking app need to permissions to take pictures, who spends their time 'customizing' a banking app with personal pictures.
Edit: I've fixed a bug where the root was still being detected when used with chainfire su app. Special thanks to lil-diabo for helping me fix the issue. :good:
Xposed module for barclays banking app 1.7.1
Edit: New version (BarcPosed1.1.apk) has some support for barclays pingit. I've not tested this my self as I don't use the application personally. If anyone tries it please let me know.
I've converted my patch into xposed module. This module is compatible with the current banking app (version 1.7.1).
Please consider this as a beta version for now. I've tested it on cyanogenmod but it might have some issues with other roms. If you try it please let me know if it worked.
Assuming you already have a working xposed installation the steps to get the app working are:
1) Install banking app from playstore. Make sure it's version 1.7.1
2) Install the BarcPosed.apk from my post.
3) Run the BarcPosed app and click the 'install' button. You will need to grant it root permissions.
4) Enable the module in xposed and reboot.
5) Use the barclays app as normal.
6) Disable automatic updates for the banking app to prevent it from updating.
I've included the source code for the app.
Thanks, works perfectly. You sir (or madam) are a genius
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Works like a charm
Just tested it and it works!
Most excellent, Thanks again for your hard work.
So much easier than having to manually edit the files etc.
It works,excellent job, finally can use Barclays mobile, thank you very much
sent from Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
Just tested and it worked marvellously. Could you please make a fix for pingit as well?
Zell Dinch said:
Just tested and it worked marvellously. Could you please make a fix for pingit as well?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HiddenRambler said:
Edit: New version (BarcPosed1.1.apk) has some support for barclays pingit. I've not tested this my self as I don't use the application personally. If anyone tries it please let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've updated my post with version that stops the rooted warning from pingit. Don't use pingit myself so don't know how successful it is. Let me know if you try it.
Brilliant, been struggling in vain with Root Cloak Plus on my N5 but this works perfectly. Many thanks.
Sent from my Xoom Wifi using Tapatalk
Before I switched to KK, I used Barclays App 1.3 doing a small trick with SuperSU. It worked perfectly. I signed the app myself so that it wouldn't update itself from the market and so that I could still use the automatic update in the market.
Do you think it would be possible to make your AMAZING solution work with my v1.3 signed app instead?
thnx
vivelafrance said:
Before I switched to KK, I used Barclays App 1.3 doing a small trick with SuperSU. It worked perfectly. I signed the app myself so that it wouldn't update itself from the market and so that I could still use the automatic update in the market.
Do you think it would be possible to make your AMAZING solution work with my v1.3 signed app instead?
thnx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could try "root cloak" or "root cloak plus" they probably will work.
Actually, what I did, is sign the app with OneClickSigner and it worked fine. Now, the app is not attached to the market anymore since the signature changed, so that means I can continue to use the "automatic update" from the market and it won't ask me to update the app all the time when Barclays upload a new version.
thnx
HiddenRambler said:
...
I've converted my patch into xposed module. This module is compatible with the current banking app (version 1.7.1).
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
I have a request, can you make it compatible with GingerBread plz?
Thanks.
LoMAX_HUN said:
Hello,
I have a request, can you make it compatible with GingerBread plz?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you try the attached apk. It's the same code but built as an app for gingerbread version (API lvl 10). I couldn't test it as I don't have a phone for that version.
If it doesn't work please give me a logcat.
Banking Works, but Not PingIt
HiddenRambler said:
Edit: New version (BarcPosed1.1.apk) has some support for barclays pingit. I've not tested this my self as I don't use the application personally. If anyone tries it please let me know.
I've converted my patch into xposed module. This module is compatible with the current banking app (version 1.7.1).
Please consider this as a beta version for now. I've tested it on cyanogenmod but it might have some issues with other roms. If you try it please let me know if it worked.
Assuming you already have a working xposed installation the steps to get the app working are:
1) Install banking app from playstore. Make sure it's version 1.7.1
2) Install the BarcPosed.apk from my post.
3) Run the BarcPosed app and click the 'install' button. You will need to grant it root permissions.
4) Enable the module in xposed and reboot.
5) Use the barclays app as normal.
6) Disable automatic updates for the banking app to prevent it from updating.
I've included the source code for the app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
xposed is fantastic!
This worked for me. It's so nice to be able to update my SU binaries without fear of breaking the app.
I'm running Cyanogenmod v10.2.0 on a Samsung Galaxy S3 (International) (i9300).
I tried using the v1.1 of the BarcPosed.apk with PingIt, but it still tried to gain root and then closed itself immediately.
https://github.com/Microsoft/winfile was open source recently, so I built it for rt.
It doesnt ran under WinRT8.1 with same error like WinDjView "number 1566 didn't fnd in the library". Rebuilded new one WinDjView with leaked MFC from VS2001beta works well (with some limitation). Please research this bug. I need an 2window file manager for my RT. How can I help ya?
any chance to get the error as shown in the English ui? would be more familiar to me.
I don't think this project uses mfc.
my guess is some linked dll has an ordinal of 1566 which moved in the dll between rt8.0 and rt8.1. if i get some time I'll recreate the libs from custom def and avoid including ordinal values, so the linker will be forced to load by symbol name.
a note to remind myself how to do that:
lib.exe /def:libfile.def /out:libfile.lib
Please look at there its my opened issue
https://github.com/Microsoft/winfile/issues/6
Unfortunately even when I install English UI some parts of UI still in prenstalled language (Russian in my case) ecen when it sets to English and reboot. This error is still in Russain and Im not sure how it sounds correctly in English.
hooddy said:
Please look at there its my opened issue
https://github.com/Microsoft/winfile/issues/6
Unfortunately even when I install English UI some parts of UI still in prenstalled language (Russian in my case) ecen when it sets to English and reboot. This error is still in Russain and Im not sure how it sounds correctly in English.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Privet! Yes, thanks, I am in that github thread also.
Please try this one if you have the time and willingness.
TLDR; Made libs without ordinals to force the system to load libraries and symbols by name. Based upon your error message containing a numerical value and not knowing whether the system will fail if incorrect ordinal or will retry by name.
Steps to produce are different from these: http://www.wanderinghuman.com/blog/archives/000123.html
In addition to that workspace, here's the changes:
Linked without each library individually to see which symbols were used
For each library
created a library.def file with the missing symbols obtained from linked errors
used this command: lib /def:library.def /out:library.lib /MACHINE:ARM
If First time;Observed linker error on resulting library about 0x1c0 (MACHINE:ARM) and remembered that's the Windows CE ARM thumb1
Hex edited library.lib to replace 0x1c0 with 0x1c4 (THUMB2) where relevant
end
Adjusted linker properties to hard code my libraries, so it didn't search default libraries.
Linked and produced what is attached here.
Edit, had typo in a def file, so fixing binary after fixing it/
smb_gaiden said:
any chance to get the error as shown in the English ui? would be more familiar to me.
I don't think this project uses mfc.
my guess is some linked dll has an ordinal of 1566 which moved in the dll between rt8.0 and rt8.1. if i get some time I'll recreate the libs from custom def and avoid including ordinal values, so the linker will be forced to load by symbol name.
a note to remind myself how to do that:
lib.exe /def:libfile.def /out:libfile.lib
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NEVER LINK WITH ORDINALS, JUST NEVER. That made me lose a metric ton of time reporting stuff which was already ported to RT otherwise. It's a very bad idea, it's worse having builds with ordinals than no builds at all; a fixed version is attached by the way.
Why are you doing it by generating .libs? that's not required anymore, just add the ARM desktop SDK in individual components on VSinstaller
black_blob said:
NEVER LINK WITH ORDINALS, JUST NEVER. That made me lose a metric ton of time reporting stuff which was already ported to RT otherwise. It's a very bad idea, it's worse having builds with ordinals than no builds at all; a fixed version is attached by the way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the build. I miss some dll to run it. Can ya share it please?
And please share your Far manager build. I really miss them.
smb_gaiden said:
Privet! Yes, thanks, I am in that github thread also.
Please try this one if you have the time and willingness.
TLDR; Made libs without ordinals to force the system to load libraries and symbols by name. Based upon your error message containing a numerical value and not knowing whether the system will fail if incorrect ordinal or will retry by name.
Steps to produce are different from these: http://www.wanderinghuman.com/blog/archives/000123.html
In addition to that workspace, here's the changes:
Linked without each library individually to see which symbols were used
For each library
created a library.def file with the missing symbols obtained from linked errors
used this command: lib /def:library.def /out:library.lib /MACHINE:ARM
If First time;Observed linker error on resulting library about 0x1c0 (MACHINE:ARM) and remembered that's the Windows CE ARM thumb1
Hex edited library.lib to replace 0x1c0 with 0x1c4 (THUMB2) where relevant
end
Adjusted linker properties to hard code my libraries, so it didn't search default libraries.
Linked and produced what is attached here.
Edit, had typo in a def file, so fixing binary after fixing it/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Privet! Ill try this new build and it's not workd with the same error as early was. What about all you write there I not really undasttod what can I do for you to improve it Im sorry for my stupidility(((
black_blob
can you tell me more about that please?
hooddy said:
Privet! Ill try this new build and it's not workd with the same error as early was. What about all you write there I not really undasttod what can I do for you to improve it Im sorry for my stupidility(((
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you'll have to install the ucrt compatibility update
smb_gaiden said:
black_blob
can you tell me more about that please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Windows 10 SDKs for VS2017 have the full set of ARM .libs these days. Set the SDK version to 10.0.16299
black_blob said:
you'll have to install the ucrt compatibility update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where I can get it? Some msu file please. I try to obtain this dll form powershell and dot.net at github with no luck.
@black_blob thank you
@hooddy don't try to understand, just some development information.
smb_gaiden said:
@black_blob thank you
@hooddy don't try to understand, just some development information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thinks it's an https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/3118401/update-for-universal-c-runtime-in-windows I didn't get it over WU. Can ya share direct link for KB3118401 and KB2919355 msu for WinRT please?
Maybe this can help to build proper
https://github.com/Microsoft/winfile/issues/102
Well how about working RT build? Nope?
hooddy said:
Well how about working RT build? Nope?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ended up choosing the nuclear option, and that seems to work alright.
black_blob said:
Ended up choosing the nuclear option, and that seems to work alright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya make my day! Thank ya really much!
black_blob said:
Ended up choosing the nuclear option, and that seems to work alright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh cool, you saved my future self some time! I ordered a surface RT in order to run 8.1 and leave my main one undisturbed. However, still have some work to do elsewhere, so can you elaborate on the nuclear option in order to save my future self more time? Thank you very much!
Static linking for everything + LTCG + removal of all unused code. It ends up working so well that it has the same size as the binary with outside depends.
I got my new (used) surface rt a few days ago, spent 3 days discovering the service pack update black screen error, installing all the service packs, then using the tool provided by Qiangong et. all.
Reproduced the error with my Winfile and realised that there was one critical library that was being linked with ordinals. Drum roll... kernel32.lib due to not using /NODEFAULTLIBS.
Anyway, it has been corrected and attached is a dynamically linked winfile.exe which runs on Windows RT 8.1. It has already been signed.
Hi, I'm trying to build Android 11. When I run the command
repo sync
I obtai the error
fatal: remove-project element specifies non-existent project: platform/prebuilts/gcc/darwin-x86/mips/mips64el-linux-android-4.9
What it means? How can I resolve it?
Many thanks
Check this report from GitHub. It doesn't look like a big deal. Maybe missing resources/files that you probably don't need if you are building an OS for a phone.
I see they simple removed a line from local_manifests/untracked.xml of which contains the error.
Hi, many thanks for your reply. I have removed more than 10 lines from the xml files.
Is it a normal behaviour? Why the files are not correct?
denisgottardello said:
Hi, many thanks for your reply. I have removed more than 10 lines from the xml files.
Is it a normal behaviour? Why the files are not correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't find a direct answer. But I've searched the errors, and found that your error on the OP has a darwin-x86 on it.
So I did Google that, and found that it is an Operating System that has something to do with Mac OS, released in 2000, still active.
So as the errors of other builders. I noticed that they're building an OS for mobile phones, which does not include, for an example, darwin-x86. So I asked myself .. What's the point of including an arch that you won't need?
I think when you're building the OS, you do export the arch you're targeting, right? So did it include darwin-x86?